Categories
General

Sleep on It

Here’s a professional effectiveness tip I can really embrace. Sleep – with a clear directive to my cortex before I nod off to coordinate with my hippocampus while I peacefully slumber. Let me explain.

Research has long confirmed the vital role of sleep in mental functioning. Sleep is the time when the mind moves short-term events and memories into long-term mental storage. New research has found, however, that the process is not automatic. It works best when we explicitly direct our mind to do its thing because we know we’ll want to use the information in the future.

New research by six German scientists published in the Journal of Neuroscience and reported in Newsweek, explains why this is so. My take on the science: expecting to use information later primes the mind for a deeper kind of sleep where slow electrical waves cause the hippocampus to replay the information and bursts of electrical energy – the researchers call them “sleep spindles” – prime the cortex to receive the hippocampus’s data and to store and integrate it into existing knowledge for easy retrieval.

So no more sleepless nights for me before a keynote or big presentation, tossing and turning and rehearsing the material in my mind. I’m going to sleep my way to a memorable performance.

Categories
General

Joy Makes its Way to Business School

The merits of joy have been promoted in this blog [see past posts of raising your joy quotient]. I am  pleased to announce that joy has reached the hallowed halls of our top business schools.

Stanford Business School Marketing Professor Jennifer Aaker was profiled in the March edition of Fast Company for her popular – and one would assume joy-filled – course on the use of joy and happiness to increase employee productivity and market share.

Aaker, whose research focuses on how people find, maintain, manipulate, and use happiness to their advantage, has worked with AOL, Adobe, Facebook and other companies of the issue. “The idea of brands enabling happiness and providing greater meaning in the world is powerful,” she concludes.

Four suggestions for your joyful leadership that can be drawn from Aaker’s work:

  1. 1.  Create a happiness plan for your company or department. What would add more joy to the work day for you? For others?  How’s the predicted impact on productivity and on sales?
  1. 2.  Probe what makes you happy. Aaker, for example, asks her students to take a photo of a happy moment each day for 30 days and then to analyze the pattern in their pictures.
  1. 3. Recognize that there are generational differences in happiness. Younger people equate happiness with excitement, older people with peacefulness.  Respecting that difference has huge implications for personnel policies, marketing, and corporate strategy.
  1. 4.  Think about the use of social media technologies to pass on the joy – and its association with your product or service. Coke, for example, released a video of its “happiness machine” – a vending machine installed on the campus of St John’s University during exam time that dispensed (and recorded student reactions to) surprises like bouquets of flowers or a box of pizza instead of the expected can of soda. The video went viral with 2 million hits.
Categories
General

The Soul of Principled Leadership: The Road to Success and Significance

I spent a day earlier this week reading and providing feedback to a colleague on a book manuscript dealing with leadership and spirituality issues. In the academic world, that’s what professors do for one another. It’s always a plus when we learn something important from the collegial support.

The book basically asks readers to think about the inner growth needed to drive principled, high-impact leadership. I’m not doing justice to the complexity of the work because it triggered a number of profound questions that have stayed with me all week.

What are the leadership contributions that I hope to make over the course of my lifetime – the things that I want to accomplish so as to have made a real difference by the time destiny comes calling? How do my hopes fit my true leadership gifts? What do I need to do to stay focused and balanced as I steer through these uncharted waters?

These are not simple questions, and we can never answer them fully. But grappling with the larger life issues implicit in them gives us the best shot at designing and managing a career that we can be proud of and that is both successful and significant.

We live at a time that predisposes us to gloss over the need for this kind of deep reflection. There is growing research on the long-term decline in happiness in increasingly affluent and democratic societies where people are misled by a materialist culture to put money and possessions at the center of our lives. They equate success with big paychecks and ignore the growing evidence that those who focus their lives on tangible goods grow demonstrably more miserable over time than those who set out to make other, deeper contributions – and profit from the success of their energizing efforts.

If you have ever felt the golden handcuffs of a well-paying job that drained a little bit of your soul everyday – made going to work as exciting as pushing heavy rocks uphill – you know exactly what I am talking about.

Striving to make a difference feeds the soul, and nothing is more energizing. Successful business leaders confirm that inner growth matters.[1]

So, what are the contributions you want to be remembered for? What are your gifts and talents – the things you do well and really enjoy? How can you fashion your life and work to stayed focused on all that?

Answer those questions, and you are well on the road to a career of success and significance.


[1] See Andre Delbecq, Nourishing the Soul of the Leader: Inner Growth Matters, in J. Gallos (2008). Business Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Categories
General

Leading in a World of Social Media Technologies

The happenings in the Middle East say much about the power of social media technologies. They are revolutionizing the practice of leadership.

Followers need a simple cell phone to organize a groundswell in support or opposition to any leader, product, or cause. Huge crowds can be assembled with a simple text message and that powerful contemporary closer: “Pass this message on.”

Strangers with shared interests or common beliefs forge virtual communities and become cyber allies through vehicles like Facebook and Twitter. Building solidarity, commitment, and shared purpose no longer require face-to-face meetings – or even residency in the same nation or on the same continent.

A twitter revolution or a smart mob a la Howard Rheingold is no novelty. Social media technologies created the conditions to topple a controlling, military-backed, thirty year regime in a seemingly stable country like Egypt; and they continue to send aftershocks through a host of other nations. They will continue to do so.

What does all this mean for contemporary leadership?  What is important to remember? 

1. Leadership is vital. At its core, leading is a social process rooted in relationship, collaboration, and mutual interest. Advances in technology and the ease of electronic communications and social networking provide additional tools for building the networks of relationship and shared purpose needed for success.

At the same time, they also expand the need for leadership. We have mind-boggling capabilities at our finger-tips to forge global alliances, further causes, and foster organizational agendas – to create, in the language of super-blogger Seth Godin, tribes of ten or ten million who care passionately about the same things that we do. All these new groups need direction, cohesion, and contribution. They need leadership from people like you or me.

2. Leaders know and respect their followers. Perhaps there were times in history when leaders could ignore the needs and collective power of their followers. Those have passed. Then President Mubarak, sitting in his palace telling world leaders that the disturbances in Egypt will pass, is a symbol of a leader in denial and out of touch. Leaders know their followers well. Social technologies can help them in this.

3. Leaders listen to, learn from, use, and manage the social groundswell. Contemporary leaders need to take their heads out of the sand about social media technologies. They are powerful and here to stay. When United States senators twitter their constituencies, and the CEOs of Fortune 500 companies talk to their constituents through Facebook, something about leading has definitely changed.

Charlene Li and Josh Bernoff provide a wealth of strategies for working the groundswell,using it to inform and energize your leadership and organization, and turning the power of social media to your advantage. I’ve learned a lot from their book, appropriately titled Groundswell

Categories
General

Bernie Madoff and the Complicit: Willful Blindness and the Fear of Loss

In his first prison interview, Bernie Madoff dropped a bomb. He was sure a number of banks and hedge funds were “complicit” in his fraud – “willfully blind” to the discrepancies in the information available to them and living a version of I’m not going to ask and please don’t tell. Madoff’s admission to the author of an upcoming book[1] on his 16 year long Ponzi scheme – the fancy shell game that cost investors $20 billion in cash and another $65 billion in lost paper wealth – is different from his earlier claims that no one knew of his illegal shenanigans.

It’s easy to look at the “complicit” and wag a judgmental finger. We’d all like to believe that, if we had been in the shoes of the “willfully blind,” we’d have blown the whistle. The $64,000 question is, what would we have done? What would you have done?

How many times have you had real questions about someone or some situation and let it ride? Decided not to get involved? Worried about being wrong? Passed the buck – figured that someone else would notice the problem if it really exists and take corrective action?

It’s easy to conclude that the complicit bankers and hedge fund executives just wanted money. But stop there, and you’ll miss an important leadership lesson.

Those bankers and financial managers feared loss – loss to their clients, companies, loved ones, and selves.

Loss of the ability to provide good returns to their clients which could lead to loss of those clients. Loss of their seats at the bountiful Madoff table that others in their business would gladly take and use to bring good returns to clients – maybe the very clients they had just lost.

Loss of clients could mean loss of a job, reputation, career trajectory. A job loss brings income loss and inability to sustain a current lifestyle. That might mean loss of a home, community, good schools for the kids, maybe even loss of a marriage under the strain. And the list goes on.

And as their fears mounted, those bankers and hedge fund managers faced the ultimate loss: their ability to make sound executive judgments and to see life beyond the fear of loss.

How are you going to prepare yourself for the next time you need to stand up for what’s right? Will you be ready?

 


[1] Diana Henriques (2011). The Wizard of Lies: Bernie Madoff and the Death of Trust. New York: Times Books.

Categories
General

Avoiding the Black Swan Syndrome: The Paradox of Compassionate Service

The film Black Swan has created quite a buzz. In it, Natalie Portman’s character, Nina, secures the role of her dreams – the lead in Swan Lake – only to be destroyed by the pressures that accompany doing it well. There’s an important leadership lesson in that.

We can only lead well and strongly when we retain our balance and perspective. Doing this asks leaders to navigate an interesting paradox: total immersion with measured detachment.

Leadership is all about commitment, deep relationships, and authenticity. It’s hard to be successful if you  stand on the sidelines. But leaders get in trouble when they forget they are playing a role and others are responding to them in it. Reactions and dynamics – positive or negative – that look very personal aren’t really very personal at all. In the leadership dance, we relate role to role.

Anyone who has ever been a lame duck having announced his or her decision to step down knows exactly what I am talking about.

Boston University social psychologist William Kahn in his study of caregivers identified a paradox in compassionate service that sheds insights on all this.

Caring professionals who serve others in need require simultaneous openness to and distance from those they seek to aid. They need clear boundaries to sustain objectivity, protect themselves from the stress of the work, and nurture essential autonomy in others. At the same time, good caregivers, like good leaders, need to understand others deeply to respond to the unique realities of their situation over time.

This only happens when caregivers “take in” those they serve – fully grasp others’ fears, capabilities, limitations, frustrations, anger, and needs. Learned skills in “clinical detachment” enable clinicians to bound this process – remain a full step away from being personally involved.

However, skilled professionals still risk “the strain of absorption”– accumulated stress from closeness to those in need, recognition of others’ pain and frustration, and the “constant waves of emotion” that wash up against them in the course of their everyday work. Over time, compassion fatigue takes a toll. It is easy for caregivers – and even easier for leaders – to ignore this and lose their sense of balance.

Leaders face internal and external pressures to produce and dynamics that keep them focused largely on follower needs. Leadership guru John Gardner acknowledges a universal ambivalence toward leaders: people want leaders who are powerful and capable of results. At the same time, they hate dependence and giving power to others. The ambivalence pushes followers to blindly up-the-dependence-ante and then punish leaders who don’t – or can’t – deliver quickly enough.

Shared conceptions of heroic leadership – the solitary superhero whose brilliance and strength save the day – support a leader’s stoic acceptance of the added pressures. So does the reality that all leaders serve at the will of their followers. Rising expectations bring the potential for rising disappointment.

The stage is set for leaders to forget the important distinction between taking their work seriously and taking their work too personally – and we saw where that led one fictional ballerina named Nina.

Categories
General

Real Leadership is Love

Happy Valentine’s Day. Today is the perfect day to reflect on an important leadership truth. Leadership is all about love.

It’s about devotion to a cause or an organization and the deep desire to contribute in important ways.

It’s about the satisfaction from true partnership and recognition that there is power and possibility in joining with others.

It’s about deep relationships and collaboration that result in the reciprocal learning at the heart of shared mission and purpose.

It’s about appreciation for others who are vital to advancing a mission.

It’s about the maturity to separate liking someone from recognizing that we owe everyone basic human respect and a willingness to work well with them to advance a common cause.

It’s about authenticity and bringing your true self to the work.

It’s about finding joy in the challenges and the experiences. (See my previous posts on raising your joy quotient).

It’s about commitment, hard work, hanging-in during tough times, and growing from the experience.

Leadership is all about love. Is love at the center of what you do?  What would need to change to make it so?

Categories
General

Mubarak Steps Down: A Reminder of the Interactive Nature of Leadership

The resignation of former President Hosni Mubarak in Egypt brings home powerful understandings about the interactive nature of leadership.

All who aspire to lead from either the head or the foot of the table can learn something important about power, influence, and authority.

Leadership is all about relationships, and it is followers – not leaders – who ultimately control the balance of power. Part of the unstated contract between leaders and followers is the leader’s willingness to accept and respect that.

Leaders focused on their dominance, ego, image, or past success can forget the fragile nature of the bargain – and we have seen in 24/7 media coverage from Egypt over the past days what the result can be.

Followers, after all, give leaders their power and authority in exchange for the leader’s willingness to provide important services like protection, direction, and the allocation of important resources. The call for leadership – more leadership, better leadership – is always loudest in times of need. 

We want leaders with the presumed knowledge, wisdom, experience, and skill to deliver. And we are willing to accord them power – our willingness to follow and to be influenced by them – in exchange for their responding to our needs.

It’s only a matter of time for leaders who can’t deliver or who lose touch with their followers’ needs. In the age of twitter revolutions, the fragile balance of power can shift in a matter of days.

It may be easier to see this tacit leader-follower power bargain when played out in public sector leadership as in Egypt. But organizational leaders, be forewarned. The same dynamic applies to you.  Anyone who has tried to lead a department or unit where subordinates have lost confidence in your ability to deliver, an organization without the support of your board, a group who doesn’t believe you understand their needs, an enterprise from the lame duck status of being yesterday’s leadership news knows exactly what I mean.  

Categories
General

The Leadership Fallacy: You See What I See

Leaders need to understand their world in order to influence it.  This requires sharp sense-making skills.  Sense-making on the surface seems like a cinch: you notice something, decide what to make of it, and determine what to do about it. Humans are pretty fast at this, and therein lies the problem. We tend to overlook four limiting features of the process.

1. Sense-making is always incomplete. Humans can attend to only a small portion of the information and experiences available to them. Our non-conscious is always hard at work attending to some data and screening out others. We rarely reflect on what and how much we ignore.

Stop reading for a minute and think about what’s happening around you. Are there sounds? A humming printer? Buzzing ceiling lights? Colleagues bustling in the background? What about movements? People passing your door? Traffic visible out your window?  How about light? Objects in your periphery vision? What’s the comfort level of your chair? The feel of your hands resting on your desk/lap/keyboard? Is the room hot or cold? You get the point. We always know more than we know we do.

2. Sense-making is very personal. Individuals’ values, education, past experience, cognitive capacities, physical abilities, and developmental limitations influence what they see. But since sense-making occurs so quickly and tacitly, the everyday explanations leaders construct feel so obvious and real to them that they seem more like Truth and the way the world really is than the individual creations and interpretations that they are.

This can blind leaders to available alternatives, gaps in their thinking, and biases. It also leaves them feeling little incentive to question their interpretations.

3. Sense-making is interpretive. When thrown into life’s ongoing stream of experiences, people create explanations of what things mean – and often assume that others either see things the same way or, if they don’t, they are wrong.

4. Sense-making is action-oriented. People’s personal interpretations contain implicit prescriptions for how they and others should respond.

If you conclude, for example, that your unit’s budget problems result from over-spending, you’ll cut expenses. If you see the problem as inadequate allocations, you’ll lobby for more. If you bemoan inattention to revenue generation, you’ll develop new programs, services, or products.  If it’s embezzlement, you’ll call the police.

You can see the ease and the potential complications in all this for leaders.  They’re off and running before they’re even sure what’s most important and where they should really be heading.  And they’re rarely aware that this is what they are doing.  For more, check out Reframing Academic Leadership (Jossey-Bass, 2011), Chapter 2: Sense-making and the Power of Reframing.

Categories
General

The Leadership Professor has a new domain

My leadership blog has really taken root – and many thanks to those who now follow. I’d love to hear your comments and topics of interest.  Leave a comment after a post or email me your thoughts.  

My posts will still be available through my website (www.joangallos.com), but you can now access them directly in a new and improved format at my new domain – the leadership professor.com. 

So reset your subscription or your bookmark for http://www.theleadershipprofessor.com  Add this url to your blogroll. Tell your friends. Forward a post.  The world can never have too many skilled leaders.  

Onward in strengthening your leadership skills and capacities!